
Discussion on Control-Related Choices Under HKFRS

In recent years, the discussion surrounding corporate governance and the choice of concurrent chairperson and CEO roles in Hong Kong has gained significant attention. This issue is particularly relevant as businesses seek to balance leadership structure with effective oversight. The question often arises under Hong Kong's regulatory framework, is it possible or even advisable to choose a concurrent chairman and CEO role? This article delves into this topic by examining the current regulations, recent developments, and expert opinions to provide clarity on the matter.
Hong Kong's corporate governance landscape is shaped by the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong HKEX Listing Rules and the Companies Ordinance. These regulations aim to ensure transparency, accountability, and the protection of shareholders' interests. Historically, the HKEX has been cautious about concurrent chairperson and CEO roles, emphasizing the importance of separation between these positions to prevent conflicts of interest and enhance corporate governance quality. However, the rules allow for flexibility, provided that companies implement robust internal controls and disclose their rationale clearly to investors.
Recent events have sparked renewed interest in this debate. For instance, in 2024, a prominent Hong Kong-based multinational corporation decided to consolidate the roles of chairman and CEO. The company justified this move by citing the need for streamlined decision-making in response to rapid market changes. This decision was met with mixed reactions from stakeholders. Some praised the move for its potential to increase efficiency, while others expressed concerns over the lack of independent oversight. This case highlights the delicate balance between operational agility and governance effectiveness.
Experts in the field of corporate governance weigh in differently on this issue. Professor Liang, a leading academic in business ethics, argues that concurrent roles can be advantageous when the individual holds exceptional leadership skills and a deep understanding of the company's operations. He points out that such a structure can lead to faster implementation of strategic initiatives without the delays associated with dual reporting lines. Conversely, Dr. Chan, a governance consultant, emphasizes the risks involved. She warns that without clear delineation of responsibilities, the concentration of power could lead to unchecked authority, potentially harming minority shareholders' interests.
The legal framework in Hong Kong provides a safety net for companies opting for concurrent roles. According to the HKEX Listing Rules, companies must ensure that the chairman is not involved in day-to-day management and that there is an independent non-executive director available to oversee executive decisions. Furthermore, annual general meetings must include a discussion on governance practices, providing shareholders with an opportunity to voice their concerns and approve the structure.
Looking ahead, the future of concurrent roles in Hong Kong will likely depend on evolving market dynamics and regulatory adjustments. As global best practices continue to influence local markets, companies may find themselves under increasing pressure to adopt more stringent governance standards. It is essential for boards to carefully evaluate their specific circumstances before deciding on the role structure. Transparency and accountability remain key principles that should guide these decisions.
In conclusion, while Hong Kong's regulatory environment allows for the possibility of concurrent chairperson and CEO roles, the decision should not be taken lightly. Companies must weigh the benefits of streamlined decision-making against the potential risks of concentrated power. By adhering to established guidelines and maintaining open communication with stakeholders, organizations can navigate this complex terrain effectively. As the business environment continues to evolve, so too must the approaches to corporate governance to ensure sustainable growth and long-term success.
Still have questions after reading this? 26,800+ users have contacted us. Please fill in and submit the following information to get support.

Previous Article
Decoding Hong Kong Company BR Number Registration Rules, Meanings & Usage
Apr 15, 2025Service Scope
More
Customer Reviews
Small *** Table
December 12, 2024The experience was very good. I was still struggling to compare it with other companies. I went to the site a few days ago and wanted to implement it as soon as possible. I didn't expect that everything exceeded my expectations. The company is very large, with several hundred square meters. The employees are also dedicated and responsible. There is also a wall of certificates. I placed an order on the spot. It turned out that I did not make a wrong choice. The company's service attitude is very good and professional. The person who contacted me explained various things in detail in advance. After placing the order, the follow-up was also very timely, and they took the initiative to report the progress to me. In short, I am very satisfied and recommend this company!
Lin *** e
December 18, 2024When I first consulted customer service, they recommended an agent to me. They were very professional and patient and provided excellent service. They answered my questions as they came in. This 2-to-1 service model is very thoughtful. I had a lot of questions that I didn’t understand, and it’s not easy to register a company in Hong Kong. Fortunately, I have you.
t *** 7
December 19, 2024I originally thought that they only did mainland business, but I didn’t expect that they had been doing Hong Kong business and were doing very well. After the on-site interview, I decided to ask them to arrange the registration of my Hong Kong company. They helped me complete it very quickly and provided all the necessary information. The efficiency was awesome. It turns out that professional things should be done by professionals.👍
b *** 5
December 16, 2024In order to register a company in Hong Kong, I compared many platforms and stores and finally chose this store. The merchant said that they have been operating offline for more than 10 years and are indeed an old team of corporate services. The efficiency is first-class, and the customer service is also very professional.